Late breaking abstracts

1. The Scientific Committee will only accept original scientific material, which has not been published before. However, abstracts previously presented at local, regional or national scientific meetings may be submitted.
2. Abstracts should be submitted in English.
3. Abstracts may be submitted as of July 13, 2016 but before August 1, 2016.

Late breaking abstracts submission

Required Information

Abstracts must be complete, relevant, balanced and written in good quality English. This will help review and selection by the Programme Committee. The following structure is strongly recommended when writing a balanced and well-designed abstract:

  • One or two sentences only on the background for the study; this should simply justify the study and not attempt to review the literature
  • One sentence clearly stating the main objective(s)
  • A summary of the methods (no more than one third of the abstract length)
  • A summary of the main results (no more than one third of the abstract length)
  • A one sentence concluding statement
  • One sentence with recommendations for practice or policy.

Conflict of Interest and Source of funding

In accordance with the policy of the Local Organizing Committee research that is funded by the tobacco industry will not be accepted. Moreover, persons affiliated with the tobacco industry are not allowed to attend scientific meetings or to participate in this conference.

You are required to state any Conflict of Interest and/or Source of funding.
Your research will not be accepted if it is funded by the tobacco industry.

All potential conflicts of interest (actual or perceived; financial or personal) that could result in bias or the perception of bias have to be disclosed at the time of abstract submission. Conflict of interest occurs when an author (or someone related to the author e.g. family member, spouse) has a relationship with any entity that has an interest (direct or indirect) related to the submission. Examples include:

  • Any form of support (financial or otherwise) for the study described in the abstract, or for other work that the author is involved in.
  • Financial relationships (which may be unrelated to the subject matter of the abstract) whereby the individual or a relative benefits by receiving a salary, royalties, consulting fees, speaker honoraria, ownership interests (e.g. stock or stock options), or other benefits.
  • Indirect benefits i.e. where the author, or author's institution, benefits from the results of the study. An example would be where the author (or their institution) runs a laboratory service which performs an essay that is discussed in the abstract.

Failure to declare a conflict of interest can lead to rejection of the abstract. Please note that it is best to practice 'full disclosure' and are on the side of caution; if in doubt, please include the item, and the Congress Committee will then decide whether or not it needs to be reported. Please include an explanation that includes the name(s) of the author(s) with the actual or perceived conflict of interest, name of the commercial entity, and the nature of the relationship.

Abstract Format

Abstracts should be formatted as follows:

Length: 250 words (2000 characters) excluding title, authors, affiliation, source of funding and conflicts of interest

  • No images, tables, graphs or references
  • Please select your preferred presentation form
  • Topic - please select one of the topics below:
1. Basic science/pre-clinical
2. Clinical/treatment
3. Comorbidities
4. Epidemiology
5. Experimental/Intervention
6. Genetics
7. Legislation / Policy
8. Qualitative
9. Pharmacology
10. Special populations
11. Tobacco industry

  • Title
  • Authors
  • Initials and last name only using capitals, no degrees/qualifications/titles
  • Separate from the affiliations with a single space line
  • Affiliations
  • Name of department, University/Institution/Company, City, Country (not postal address)
  • Use symbols (not superscript) to indicate author affiliation in the following order: * § %, and then ** etc.
  • Start each new affiliation on a separate line
  • Body text
  • Plain text
  • Separate from the source(s) of funding with a single space line
  • Source(s) of funding must be stated
  • Authors should state ?self-funded? if appropriate
  • All other sources of funding should be named giving the full title of each funding body
  • Use the format ?Sources of funding: XX?
  • Conflict(s) of interest must be stated
  • Authors should state ?none declared? if appropriate
  • All other potential conflicts of interest must be stated in full
  • It is the authors responsibility to consider where there may be conflicts of interest
  • Use the format ?Conflicts of interest: XX?
Copyright © 2013 Galén Symposion, All Rights Reserved
web-mastering People For Net a.s.